CR-07 · ORIGINAL FICTIONAL EXAMPLE · PROPOSED

Add an HTML edition to the Visitor Guide

Review the requested difference before revising the project records. No real project authorization is supplied.

Current reference · Scope-v1

One eight-page PDF. One consolidated review round. Estimated effort: 8 person-hours.

Proposed difference

Add one self-contained HTML reading edition using the same text. Retain the PDF. One consolidated round covers both formats.

Reason: browser review. No hosting, content service or ongoing maintenance included.

Effort and unresolved impacts

8 + 2 + 1 = 11 person-hours proposed

HTML layout: 2 added hours. Review: 1 added hour. Increment: 3 person-hours. These are fictional estimates.

Calendar effect, actual cost and reviewer availability: unresolved. No rate or delivery date supplied.

Dependency: guide text ready before layout; reviewer availability to confirm.

Records that would change

Scope-v1: Add the HTML deliverable, boundaries and review allowance.
Delivery-list-v1: List PDF plus HTML and their maintained file references.
Review-checklist-v1: Add heading, internal-link and agreed desktop/phone layout checks. Proposed checks only; no finished guide has been tested.

Read the three fictional source records

These supplied references describe the teaching baseline, not actual approved customer records.

Scope-v1: eight-page PDF; one consolidated review round; estimated 8 person-hours.
Delivery-list-v1: PDF only.
Review-checklist-v1: PDF review.

Alternatives for the decision owner

Retain the PDF-only scope and defer HTML; or consider the additional format with its estimated effort and review arrangement. Neither alternative is selected.

Actual decision fields · unfilled

Requester / request dateBaseline authorization referenceDecision / decision maker / dateAuthorization reference / resulting versions