Hosting arrangements for client work

Whoever holds the hosting owns the outage. Decide that on purpose rather than by default.

Hosting a client's site is a service with obligations attached. Agencies acquire those obligations by accident and then carry them unpaid.

Domain, hosting and maintenance split by who holds each.
Domain, hosting and maintenance split by who holds each.

The domain belongs to the client

Without exception.

Registered in an account they own, paid by them, with a contact address that is theirs. You have administrative access to make changes.

The alternative, an agency holding client domains, is a liability in three directions. If you disappear, they lose the name. If you fall out, you are holding something of theirs and the conversation becomes ugly. And if you forget a renewal, you have lost a client's business name.

Asset Held by Agency role
Domain Client Access
Hosting account Client, usually Access
The site files Client, copy with agency Builds and deploys
Analytics Client account Access
Certificates Automatic Confirm they renew

Who holds hosting

There is a defensible case either way and the failure is not deciding.

The client holds it. They pay the provider, you have access. Nothing breaks when the relationship ends, and you are not in the billing chain. This is the cleaner arrangement for most work.

You hold it. Sometimes justified: you are providing a managed service, you are consolidating many small sites, or the client genuinely cannot administer anything. It must be priced, scoped and put in writing, because it includes uptime, renewals and being called when something is wrong.

What happens by default is the second, unpriced. That is how an agency ends up with thirty sites it cannot charge for and cannot stop supporting.

Static makes this manageable

Most client sites are brochures. As static files they cost very little to host, have no database to fail, no runtime to patch and no administration login to be attacked.

Thirty static sites is close to no maintenance. Thirty sites on traditional hosting with plugins is somebody's job, and eventually somebody's emergency.

Where a site does not genuinely need a server, building it static is the single largest reduction in ongoing obligation available.

A handover sheet listing accounts, who pays, and who is called.
A handover sheet listing accounts, who pays, and who is called.

Write down who is called

Before anything breaks, agree three things in writing.

Who pays for what. Domain, hosting, any services.

Who is called when it is down, and when. Business hours or not, expected response, and whether it is included or billed.

What happens at the end. How the site and every account transfer, and how long you keep a copy.

None of that is difficult at the start of a relationship. All of it is difficult at the end of one.

Two neighbouring cases are worth a look: A freelance site that maintains itself and How to set up a client portal.

Put it at an address

Register every client domain in their account, decide who holds hosting deliberately and price it, build static where you can, write down who is called when it breaks, and agree the handover before you need it.

Questions people ask

Should an agency hold client hosting?

Only deliberately, with it priced and scoped. Holding it by default means inheriting uptime, renewals and out-of-hours calls for free.

Who should own the domain?

The client, always, in their own account. Holding a client’s domain is a liability and it poisons every disagreement.

What is the cleanest arrangement?

The client holds the accounts and pays the providers; the agency has access. Nothing depends on the agency continuing to exist.

What about many small static sites?

Static hosting makes this manageable. Each site is a folder, costs little or nothing, and has almost no maintenance.

What has to be written down?

Who pays for what, who is called when it is down, and what happens at the end of the relationship.

Keep reading