How to publish a brand book

The book explains why. The guidelines give somebody a hexadecimal value at four in the afternoon. Those are different documents.

Two documents get combined into one and neither works afterwards. Separating them is most of the job.

A brand book and a guidelines page shown as two separate artefacts.
A brand book and a guidelines page shown as two separate artefacts.

Two readers, two documents

The brand book is read once, in order, by somebody forming an understanding. A new starter in their first week. An agency about to begin. Somebody deciding whether to work with you.

The guidelines are looked up, under time pressure, by somebody who needs a file or a value and will spend about forty seconds finding it.

A single combined document serves the first adequately and the second badly, because a supplier is now scrolling through positioning statements to reach a colour swatch.

Brand book Guidelines
Read Once, in order Looked up
Reader New staff, agencies Suppliers, designers
Contains Reasoning Files and rules
Best format Designed document or page Page
Length Short enough to finish As short as possible

What makes a brand book worth reading

Decisions with reasons.

Why this mark rather than the three that were rejected. Why the palette is restrained. What the organisation will not do, and why. What the founders were reacting against.

That is interesting, memorable, and useful to somebody who has to make a judgement call the guidelines do not cover.

What gets skipped is a page of abstract values. Integrity, excellence and innovation appear in every brand book ever produced and guide nobody. If a value would not be contradicted by any competitor, it is not saying anything.

Keep it finishable

A brand book is read in one sitting or not at all.

Twenty pages that somebody finishes beats eighty they abandon on page nine. Cut the history of the sector, the market analysis, and anything that is context rather than decision.

If it is genuinely long, split it and say what each part is for.

A brand book page showing a rejected option beside the chosen one, with the reasoning.
A brand book page showing a rejected option beside the chosen one, with the reasoning.

The guidelines belong on a page

Looked up under time pressure, on whatever device is to hand.

Individual logo downloads. Colour values as copyable text. The typeface and its fallback. Three rules that are genuinely not allowed.

A document is the wrong format for that, and it is why guidelines documents go unread while people take logos from websites.

The book ends with a link to the guidelines. The guidelines carry a line saying the reasoning is in the book.

Then a supplier who is curious can read the thinking, and a new starter who needs a file can get one, without either wading through the other.

For the surrounding ground, see What brand identity means in practice and How to share brand guidelines as a link.

Put it at an address

Separate the book from the guidelines, explain decisions rather than values, publish guidelines as a page, link each to the other, and keep the book short enough to finish.

Then the person who needs a colour value gets one, and the person who needs to understand the company can.

Questions people ask

What is the difference from guidelines?

A brand book explains the thinking: the positioning, the reasoning behind the identity, what the organisation is for. Guidelines are a reference for people applying it.

Who reads a brand book?

New staff, agencies starting work, and anybody deciding whether to work with you. Read once, in order, which is the opposite of how guidelines are used.

Should they be one document?

No. Combining them means a supplier scrolls through positioning to find a colour value, and a new starter reads a file specification to understand the company.

Should the book be a PDF?

It is a designed artefact read once, so a PDF is defensible. A page is better if anyone reads it on a phone, which new starters do.

What makes a brand book worth reading?

Specific decisions with reasons. Why this mark rather than the other three, what was rejected, what the organisation refuses to do. Abstract values are skipped.

Keep reading