Editing tools and publishing platforms compared

One gives you the file back. The other keeps it and gives you a link to their site.

These two kinds of service get compared constantly and they answer different questions.

A tool returning a file beside a publisher returning a link on their own domain.
A tool returning a file beside a publisher returning a link on their own domain.

What each one is

A tool performs one operation, compressing, merging, splitting, converting, and hands the file back. You take it away. The service typically deletes the upload within an hour, which it will usually tell you.

A publisher takes the document and hosts it. You get a link on their domain, and visitors see the document inside their reader, with their navigation, their branding and sometimes their advertising.

If you want a file, the first. If you want a link, the second, and then a further question.

Tool Publisher
You end up with A file A link
The address is Yours, nowhere yet Theirs
The interface is None Theirs
Retention Usually an hour Indefinite
Cost of leaving Nothing Every link breaks

The question about publishers

Whose page is a reader actually on?

The document is yours. The address, the reader interface, the branding around it and the recommendations underneath it are not. For a magazine or a catalogue, that means your customer is reading your material on somebody else's page, with somebody else's suggestions next to it.

Sometimes that is an acceptable trade for a viewer you did not have to build. It is worth deciding rather than discovering.

Free tiers and locked documents

Publishing platforms are hosting costs, and hosting costs grow.

The recurring pattern is a free tier that becomes limited: view counts capped, downloads restricted, documents placed behind a sign-up. Your document is still there and the people you sent it to now meet a wall.

If the link has been printed or widely circulated, you cannot fix that quietly.

The same catalogue inside a platform reader and on its own page.
The same catalogue inside a platform reader and on its own page.

The third option

Publish the document at your own address.

It displays in the browser, on any device, with no reader interface but yours. The link is on your domain, which means it keeps working regardless of what any platform decides, and it is yours to repoint if the document moves.

For a catalogue, a brochure, a price list or a report, this is usually what people wanted from a publishing platform in the first place. They went to the platform because the step of getting a document to display at an address was the part that looked difficult.

For the surrounding ground, see Comparing document publishing platforms and Choosing a document hosting alternative.

Put it at an address

Decide whether the outcome is a file or a link, check the retention period on tools, check whose brand surrounds a published document, watch what happens to free tiers, and publish at your own address when the document is yours.

Questions people ask

What is the difference?

A tool performs an operation and returns the file. A publisher hosts the document at an address on their domain and shows it inside their reader.

Which do I need?

A tool if the outcome is a file. A publisher if the outcome is a link, and then check whose brand is around it.

What is wrong with publishing platforms?

Nothing, if you accept that the address, the surrounding interface and often the advertising are theirs, and that free tiers may change.

Do they keep my documents?

Tools state a retention period, often an hour. Publishers keep the document indefinitely, because hosting it is the product.

What is the third option?

Publish it yourself at your own address. The document displays, the brand is yours, and the link cannot be taken away.

Keep reading